Written and (c) by Lothar Fritsch on November 7,1995

Book Review: The Future does not compute

Transcending the machines in our midst

The book's cover

by Stephen L. Talbott

Published by O'Reilly Associates in 1995
ISBN 1-56592-085-6
Price: US $23

Computers are everywhere in society. And through the current efforts to connect a whole society to a national - and later worldwide - data 'super highway', computers are about to transform jobs, human relationships and communication habits. While the industry supports this idea, only few think about the negative influence on society coming along with a digital 'global village', children being educated by computers and human relations and experiences depending on computer screens (1). This is what this book is about.

Structure of the book

The book has 25 chapters, and a three-part appendix, filling about 450 pages. The chapters are divided into four main parts:

  1. Men, computers and community
  2. Computers in education
  3. The electronic word
  4. Owen Barfield, computers and the evolution of conciousness

This text will summarize the main parts of the book and evaluate it in the 'Final Remarks' section. Numbers in parentheses like '(1)' are footnotes.

In the first chapter - a preface where the author mentions most of the topics he will discuss in later parts of the book - the central question is: "Will human ideals survive the Internet?"
The author is concerned about the confusion of human qualities and technical capabilities and about the impact of computer mediated multimedia communication on personality. 'Scattering' is what he calls the superficial attitude of receiving as much 'input' as possible to one's senses but not reflecting about it. Analogies to television zapping or driving cars out of pure boredom are made. The computer screen as a primary source of 'world experience' is set equivalent to a complete loss of freedom: "...all of Cyberspace ... is available through this small window on my desk. ...until recently most windows mediating the world to us in such a restrictive fashion had steel bars in them. Not many welcomed the prison [in the way the computer windows are welcomed]." (p.15)

Part One: Men, computers and community

People's attitude towards computers and the way computer use is currently promoted by its advocates is the focus of part one. Obviously Talbott knows Neil Postman's Technopoly - he writes about the influence of a technology on it's users (2). Personal responsibility for computer use is what humans should develop in face of the machine - developing the discipline to be a human and not a biological input device.
Talbott faces the vision of a 'network community' with pessimism. Why should humans enter a paradise of understanding and tolerance just because they are connected by a communication network? And why would a networked world - run by the same people that didn't fight all the misery in the pre-networked world - be better just by being on the network, leaving the homeless at least with the ability to communicate to humans far away while he starves (chap. 6)?
The promise of freedom through free access to information processing is one of the biggest visions of the networked age. But Talbott is sceptical and states: freedom is being, not doing. Turning the world into a nice place needs a certain state of mind, not a state of technical communication (chap. 7).
Complex technical systems sometimes reduce freedom by turning into systems that seem to have a life of their own without a controlling power. This is what Talbott calls 'Things that run by themselves'. Society's rush towards computer connectivity is such a 'thing': many connect to the network even without the need to do so because many others do. Talbott suggests to playfully explore and evaluate the computer technology and mentions the risks of participating without a need to do so: "I would not look toward businesses that leap into a market opportunity just because it's there - letting themselves grow explosively as the opportunity allows, until the whole market suddenly collapses (as tends to happen when you are dealing with artificially created 'needs') or changes its character." (p.102).
The 'global village' is questioned in chapter 9. What is a village culture? And what will happen to cultures that are not compatible with computers or that simply don't have computers? Talbott suggests that they will be assimilated into a technological imperialism, forcing the world's cultures to fit into the western computer culture.
Computer application at the workplace do not only increase efficiency but can lead to increase the lack of communication between employees or workgroups. The reader is presented an example where employees of a workgroup increased productivity through using a computer-based, anonymous discussion group, yielding a "lack of intimidation" between the participants (p.117). Talbott argues that here is an obvious human to human communication problem that is solved through computers by isolating the humans - not by bringing them closer together.
Part one's conclusion is, in short: be awake, think for yourself, don't do things because others do them. Talbott says: humans seem to have a certain preference for mechanical procedures - and the computer is the most powerful tool to reduce human thinking to a sequence of mechanical procedures (p.132f).

Part 2: Computers in education

Part two covers the issues of computer-based education in the age of hypermedia networks. Talbott examines the much-promoted opportunity for children to communicate with children in other countries using the Internet. Global understanding, tolerance and breaking down cultural barriers are expected from Internet-based education. But the network communication experience is not necessarily applied to personal relationships by the children, as a teacher running a communications project at a school is quoted: "...I have yet to see any of the ...students, who spent weeks 'talking' with students in Kuala Lumpur, say so much as a word to the Southeast Asian students [who are their schoolmates]..." (p.140).
The author fears the further undermining of the human teacher. In his opinion, human interaction is the only useful way to learn about humans. He doesn't want computers to be banned from education, but he wants students to have a base of real-world experiences before they enter 'Cyberspace' - to enable them to see the differences between the natural and the artificial world. Talbott draws parallels to television science and nature education programs by presenting modern people's frustration when joining guided nature trips where the animals just don't show up to 'perform' like they do on television programs. The lack of real nature experience and expectations to see the television highlights lead to this.
High abstraction levels are another problem of image based education: being presented with images of rotating 'billard-balls' as a model for molecules, how many humans actually think of molecules as tiny balls? The solution according to Talbott is to teach imagination, phantasy and real experience to children first to enable them to understand the abstraction as an abstraction. Computer models are compared to Lego blocks: they can be used to build a lot of nice things, but the 'atoms' of the Lego world are mere blocks, very abstracted from the various different components real world and nature objects are made of.
The conclusion of part two is that children need real experience and human contacts to be able to face a world filled with artificial, abstract images. Children need to experience the 'spirit' of things, they must not study dead facts to become a creative human being.

Part 3: The electronic word

Part three deals with words - the way they are produced, processed and received electronicaly. When producing words on a word processor - the author observes - humans enter a hypnotic state of mind (3), where they produce words without reflection or thought taking place before writing. The 'detached word' is mentioned as a symptom of the age of word-processing: due to the ease of copy-and-paste, earlier thoughts are copied or modified and the context around them is matched to the copied blocks instead of writing out new thoughts that match the context.
Confusion of 'information', 'wisdom', 'knowledge' and 'logic' usually appears when the advocates of the digital future speak. Talbott asks, what happend if the amazed 'netsurfers' were sent to a huge library: "Would there, in these surroundings, be the same, breathless investigation of every room and shelf, the same shouts of glee at finding this collection of art prints or that provocative series of essays or these journalistic reports on current events?" (p.195f). Talbott suggests that today's worshippers of technology have the severe misconception that the possession of huge amounts of organized data - called information - automatically(4) leads to knowledge, intelligence and wisdom (p.199).
The loss of knowledge that lies in the gaps between keywords when storing on computers is covered as well as the promise of more power for the individual (which implies the individual has to give up his or her humanity first to receive a certain amount of digital power).
The emptiness of mechanical words is one of the main concerns in part three. Being exposed to language completely detached from human beings (like books, radio, television) humans lose the word's content - the meaning. Parallel to the words becoming mechanical, humans personalize machines and lose their ability to listen (and reflect). This is - according to the author - indicated by browsing usenet news articles in a very superficious way, filtering electronic mail messages with logic-based tools, answering electronic messages immediately instead of reflecting them. The communication has become important, it's not the content any more (chap. 19).

Part 4: Owen Barfield, computers and the evolution of conciousness

This part - representing almost one third of the book - presents the thoughts of Owen Barfield regarding words, meanings, the shift of meanings, human conciousness and the mind. Sometimes hard to read and quickly changing subjects, Talbott quotes various pagagraphs from Barfield's work and draws the analogies to the computer related topics he covered in the former three parts.
The human's shift from seeing the world - from the view of being contained within the medieval world to 'seeing in perspective' (being an object in between other objects within a space of unrelated objects) illustrates the powerful influence of technology and science on the consciousness of humans. The danger of reducing human mind's skills to digital logic and the machine's skills are covered in a large section of part four. The various efforts in Artificial Intelligence are reviewed under the topic of mechanizing human behaviour as well as the question whether user interfaces improved during the last years or whether the users rather continued their descent to computer's level is analyzed.
Talbott points out the universal potential of the computer: to either improve human life or to make it worse. He manages to convince the reader that it lies in man's hands to make the desicion to use the technology in the right way and advocates there is still time to do the change from unconcious to concious computer use.
The final chapter - 'What was this book about?' summarizes Talbott's conclusion: to transcend computers, humans must ask questions, change themselves, transform their environment and fight the human urge to follow algorithmic patterns of thought and action instead of thinking new thoughts. Exploring new thoughts and suffering are necessary for human development while following algorithms prevents development, concludes the author.

Appendix

The three-part appendix offers further excerpts from Owen Barfield's work, some thoughts about virtual reality and the new views or conciousnesses it could introduce and finally a chapter about education without computers, introducing the author's favourite school system: the Waldorf school. It does not focus on computers, but offers some additional details to material that was presented in the former chapters.

Final Remarks

This book is a unique source of thoughts about the dangers of computerization. It shows how unnoticed and silent the unreflected use of computers reduces human skills to the machine's capacity. It covers an important area of computer application that was left blank in computer literature up to now - not even the famous media critics like Neil Postman or Noam Chomsky yet dedicated books to the computerized society. The huge bibliography invites further reading on this subject - which in the case of Owen Barfield's work is absoultely necessary because part four is too compact and rich in various of Barfield's subjects that it needs more reflection.
Talbott is absolutely right to question some of today's movements towards computers. Reading this book is a must for every person working in the field of computer education, new media or networking. It will change the reader's view of the subject from a only-positive to a more critical view. O'Reilly's displayed some of the human qualities Talbott advocates by publishing this book. And designing the book cover similar to the over-advertised Windows'95 operating system's sales box is for sure no coincidence.


Lothar Fritsch, c676037@showme.missouri.edu